Sh'mot (January 14, 2012)
(15) The king of Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives, one of whom was named Shiphrah and the other Puah, (16) saying, “When you deliver the Hebrew women, look at the birthstool: If it is a boy, kill him; if it is a girl, let her live.” (17) The midwives, fearing God, did not do as the king of Egypt had told them; they let the boys live.
(5) The daughter of Pharaoh came down to bathe in the Nile, while her maidens walked along the Nile. She spied the basket among the reeds and sent her slave girl to fetch it. (6) When she opened it, she saw that it was a child, a boy crying. She took pity on it and said, “This must be a Hebrew child.”
Excerpted from The Torah: A Modern Commentary, Revised Edition, editor W. Gunther Plaut (NY: URJ Press, 2005). Used by permission of URJ Press, www.urjbooksandmusic.com.
In addition to setting the stage for the events that followed, Parashat Sh’mot contains some of the most powerful and daring, yet overlooked, female characters in the Torah, and that is where I’d like to focus.
We are told that the new Pharaoh in Egypt, who did not know Joseph, began oppressing the Israelites, “But the more they were oppressed, the more they increased and spread out, so that the [Egyptians] came to dread the Israelites.” (Exodus 1:12) So, the Pharaoh devised a plan to wipe out the Israelite people.
The king of Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives, one of whom was named Shiphrah and the other Puah, saying, “When you deliver the Hebrew women, look at the birthstool: if it is a boy, kill him; if it is a girl, let her live.” The midwives, fearing God, did not do as the king of Egypt had told them; they let the boys live. (Exodus 1:15-17)
Who are these women? Why were they willing to risk their own lives to save these children? Most traditional readings tell us that Shiphrah and Puah are, in fact, Yocheved and Miriam, the mother and sister of Moses and Aaron, in which case their defiance is impressive but understandable; they are simply protecting their own. However, according to the Abrabanel, Shiphrah and Puah were Egyptian midwives for the Hebrew women (hence “Hebrew midwives”). After all, why would Pharaoh ask Hebrew women to kill their own? Surely, he wouldn’t think he could entrust them with such a task.
The Abrabanel’s explanation makes the most sense to me and shows the true bravery of Shiphrah and Puah. In a male-dominated society, these women took a stand; in a culture of violence, they defied their bloodthirsty king and stood up for what was right. What did they have to lose? Everything.
Just a few sentences later, in Exodus 2, we are introduced to baby Moses, the future leader of our people. We all know the story of Moses’ mother putting him in a basket and hiding him among the reeds in the river. Pharaoh’s daughter, Batya, finds the basket and adopts the baby. I always thought that because Batya was a princess, she could do as she pleased; so, adopting Moses, while commendable, wouldn’t have been such a tremendous task. As I examined this story further, however, I realized that Batya, like Shiphrah and Puah, was a gentile woman risking her own life to save the life of a Jewish child. As Rabbi Jonathan Sacks writes, “To save the baby would mean disobeying the royal command. That would be serious enough for an ordinary Egyptian; doubly so for a member of the royal family.” (Exodus: The Book of Redemption, p. 26) Like that of Shifra and Puah, Batya’s bravery is overlooked.
I find these three women inspiring on multiple levels. Not only were they taking strong action in a society where men ran the show, but they defied a king who, let’s face it, wasn’t exactly known for his forgiving nature. Further, they were Egyptian women standing up for what was right, regardless of religion, nationality or race. Shiphrah, Puah and Batya were the righteous gentiles of the Egyptian era, and they deserve recognition as such.
WHAT DO YOU THINK?Join the conversation by posting your thoughts.
Click here to view the Torah Commentary Archive.
Back to Torah Study